MISSION

The mission of this blog is to clarify centrist and populist political positions, and
to discover suitable third party candidates for the 2016 election.

Thursday, November 15, 2012

5 Reasons Why I Am Pro-Labor

1.      I Grew Up in a Working Class Neighborhood
I grew up in a large northern rust-belt city. My father worked as a pipefitter for the railroad, my friends’ dads worked for the steel mills and in the auto industry. About 80% of the parents of my high school classmates were blue-collar workers.

 Thanks to unionization and collective bargaining these workers were able to live the American Dream by making payments on mortgages and purchasing late model cars. One by one the houses in my working class neighborhood began sprouting television antennae.


 2.      Working Class People are Heavily Invested in their Communities
These workers coach youth sports teams, lend muscle on community projects, and continually deposit money in the emergency needs jars found at convenience stores and elsewhere. They volunteer for EMT and Fire Department duty. Their volunteerism includes local churches and community groups, such as the Lions and Kiwanis.


 3.      I Believe in Collective Bargaining
Through union lobbying and government regulations the work week was lowered from 12 hour days/6 days a week to 8 hour days/5 days a week. Pension funds were established to help retired workers subsist. Through OSHA dangerous and unsanitary working conditions diminished.
 
One has only to read about the nineteenth century robber barons or the living conditions of the meat packing plant workers in Upton Sinclair’s “The Jungle” to understand the many positive contributions of unionization and collective bargaining for the American worker. It seems that Big Business rarely establishes wages, benefits, and working conditions in the interest of its workers. But, business seems much more interested in the bottom line, the percentage of profit, and its stockholders.

 So, it seems that I am pro-union. In spite of the fact that we still don’t know what happened to Jimmy Hoffa, I am. Unions provide protection for the individual worker against abuses of the employer. Unions require the employer to abide by the negotiated contract when good will breaks down.


 4.      Capitalists Constantly Attack Workers Salaries & Benefits
The only voices advocating abolishing unions are capitalists. Often they disdain the worker as lazy. Some suggest that workers start their own businesses if they want to bring home more income.  And we are supposed to emulate these people?

I find it even more disturbing that republican led state governments, such as Wisconsin, are also attacking public service employees unions. Their employees are the ones that make state offices and agencies run. Isn’t this policy short-sighted at the least?


 5.      Working Class & Lower Middle Income Families Comprise 60% of American Society
Working class Americans and those from the lower middle class comprise 60-65% of society. Their household income is $75,000 or less. However, they are the largest segment of society. Look at the Dennis (2002) and Thompson & Hickey (2005) models in the Wikipedia article "American Middle Class".

When the US was a manufacturing economy these workers were invaluable to Big Business. Now, it’s this group that suffers the largest number of job cuts and has the hardest time finding new positions with roughly the same wage and benefits packages.

Because working class and lower middle income comprise over 60% of the economy, because their wages are not rising at the level of inflation, and because proposed tax plans don’t favor them, they feel particularly squeezed.

 
Both state and federal governments need to provide relief for working class and lower middle income families and not place the burden of subsidizing government programs on their backs.
 

7 comments:

  1. We are brothers in many ways.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey Bill, This is ACE. Sorry it has taken me so long to get back with you, I've been out of town on buisness, working long hours...
    Anyway, getting back to what I had to say about your Gay marriage position(s).Before I open my mouth, i bet you can guess i do not share your views. Your learning! What benefits do married people recieve that gay couples do not? I compiled a list of things / rights that are common to both married straight couples and non-married gay couples>/have a car note . joint savings, joint checking, joint on credit cards, a mortage, other investment properties, ira's, cd's, money mkt.'s, dual ownership of basically anything, heirs to each others will, inheritances's (sp) , they can use the ""who to contact" for emergencies. Name me something other than having a piece of paper that say's their married that gay's CANT have or do that married couples can. My point is that this whole push for gay marriage and civil unions is nothing more that an attempt of indoctrination to a un-Godly sub-culture. God in the Bible gives the proper definition of marriage ,(being between a man and a woman)and also gives straight answers (no decernment needed) about what happens to people who engage in homosexuality. Bottom line is that if you agree to civil unions, then the gau community canuse that as a step in their direction. ace

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi ACE, Glad to hear from you again.

    Regarding priviledges that married couples have that aren't extended to gay couples:

    Are you aware that in many states unmarried gay partners have no hospital visitation rights? Sometimes they can't be insurance beneficiaries? In an inheritance battle they're not considered next of kin, and so remotely related relatives can win battles over unmarried gay partners?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. how about visiting during visiting hours? If they know they can't be beneficiaries on insurance, then convert the policy into am IRA or a MM...As far as inheritance goes, how many times have we heard of the little old lady leaving her fortune to a complete stranger or even a pet., Mark my words, "Civil unions are stepping stones, feet in the door to an un-holy agenda"! If you give an inch, they will expect a mile. Tell me something. A candidate is someone for the people, correct? He/She should be representing a group majority and their interest. Isn't that correct? Then tell me how a group (homosexual couples) which according to the 2010 census makes up .77% of all couples in the us, that's less than 1%.And also has a lobby in Washington, How did they get a majority of the people snowed into buying into there cause. Where else on God's green earth can less than 1% of a population dictate to the other 99%? and the other 99% is stupid for even giving it any credence.
      ace...

      Delete
    2. Ace, you and I are obviously thinking differently about gay partners gaining visitation rights in hospitals. For serious illnesses and ICU confinements hospitals have "immediate family only" visitation rules. Obviously, then, there are no regular visiting hours. Generally, when a patient is in extreme danger of dying, hospitals may extend in room stays for spouses and completely curtail normal visitation hours. It is times like these that the best patient and family care, the best mercy showing, is to allow spouses some last intimate moments with each other. However, in some states, gay partners without benefit of a legal union cannot enjoy these privileges. These last moments of intimate exchange are just as important for gay couples as they are for heterosexual couples. It is human compassion that asks for extended privileges for gay couples.

      Recently, I lost a gay friend who suddenly fell sick, and no, his illness was not Aids or STD related. Fortunately, he and his partner of over 20 years had recently entered into a legal union. For my friend's last few days the partners were inseparable. This is just as it should be.

      I'm not sure that you know any gay men or women. I'm guessing that they wouldn't be comfortable around you, either. Compassion doesn't need a certain percentage point to engage. It needs the compassion of the Good Samaritan and the Golden Rule.

      Now, I think, Ace, you and I have exhausted this subject on this blog. I will no longer publish comments regarding this issue. Let's move on.

      Delete
  4. Can you explain exactly what you mean by "wind fall profits".

    ReplyDelete
  5. The concept of windfall profits is pretty well known. One only needs to google the term to find many definitions and discussions of the concept. Basically, a windfall is when an unexpected situation causes a corporation to reap extraordinarily high profits, and that the corporation had no control over the situation(event). For instance, Several years ago a large Florida hurricane (can't remember which one) cause lots of damage to lots of homes. The demand for 4x8 sheets of plywood far outstretched the supply. So, the cost of plywood skyrocketed and plywood retailers and manufacturers reaped extraordinarily larger profits that the sale of that much plywood would normally generate. The extra profit over and above the normal price for the plywood is the windfall.

    We have often seen windfall profits in the oil industry. Sometimes the windfall is caused by EPA regulations, sometimes by OPEC, and sometimes disasters, such as, hurricanes, oil spills, and oil platform explosions. At these times the price of oil has risen, and the rest of the nation suffers. Consumers often suffer twice; once at the pump, and a second time at the grocery store.

    My point is that windfall profits should either be reinvested in the industry's infrasructure, or should be "taxed" by the federal government and used to pay down the national debt.

    ReplyDelete