As we headed into recession during our recent economic crisis several banks went "bankrupt" and had to close their doors. The economy was so bad that many large banks and corporations needed government loans to help stave off financial failure. Here's a list.
Adding to the crisis were looming balloon mortage payments for millions of Americans. For decades financial institutions offered risky loans to marginally qualified individuals seeking to purchase a home. Because of the balloon payments and the economic crisis many of these homeowners lost their homes. Short sales and foreclosures abounded; Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae tottered.
Then the government thought they should do something to help stave off the economic disaster. So, what did they do? They helped the banks and other corporations and let the small-time homeowners to flounder by themselves.
Part of the money given to the banks was to be invested in new loans to prop up businesses and to foster new growth. Some of the money could have been used to give relief to the beleaguered homeowners. What did the banks do? They deposited the money in their vaults and sat on it.
The banks used the government's money to earn interest so that they could get out of the red. Then they paid back the loans to the government without ever using the money to benefit anyone but themselves.
So, the banks are fine, but business still is slow to recover, and the creation of new jobs is even slower. What about the homeowners facing foreclosure? Only several months later did anyone in Washington try to help them out.
Now, the goverenment could have taken a completely different approach in the beginning of the crisis. The government could have given the money to the beleaguered homeowners, who then would have paid their mortages to the banks, thus, stemming the bleeding by the top financial institutions.
But, once again, our government "of the people, by the people, and FOR the people" caters to the rich and powerful at the expense of the average worker.
And, that's why I am against Government Bailouts
MISSION
Showing posts with label Labor. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Labor. Show all posts
Wednesday, November 28, 2012
Thursday, November 15, 2012
5 Reasons Why I Am Pro-Labor
1. I Grew Up in a Working Class Neighborhood
Thanks to unionization and collective bargaining these
workers were able to live the American Dream by making payments on mortgages
and purchasing late model cars. One by one the houses in my working class
neighborhood began sprouting television antennae.
2. Working Class People are Heavily Invested
in their Communities
3. I Believe in Collective Bargaining
Through union lobbying and government regulations the
work week was lowered from 12 hour days/6 days a week to 8 hour days/5 days a
week. Pension funds were established to help retired workers subsist. Through
OSHA dangerous and unsanitary working conditions diminished.
One has only to read about the nineteenth century robber barons or the living conditions of the meat packing plant workers in Upton Sinclair’s “The Jungle” to understand the many positive contributions of unionization and collective bargaining for the American worker. It seems that Big Business rarely establishes wages, benefits, and working conditions in the interest of its workers. But, business seems much more interested in the bottom line, the percentage of profit, and its stockholders.
So, it seems that I am pro-union. In spite of the fact
that we still don’t know what happened to Jimmy Hoffa, I am. Unions provide
protection for the individual worker against abuses of the employer. Unions
require the employer to abide by the negotiated contract when good will breaks
down.
4. Capitalists Constantly Attack Workers
Salaries & Benefits
5. Working Class & Lower Middle Income
Families Comprise 60% of American Society
I grew up in a large northern rust-belt city. My father
worked as a pipefitter for the railroad, my friends’ dads worked for the steel
mills and in the auto industry. About 80% of the parents of my high school
classmates were blue-collar workers.
These workers coach youth sports teams, lend muscle on
community projects, and continually deposit money in the emergency needs jars
found at convenience stores and elsewhere. They volunteer for EMT and Fire
Department duty. Their volunteerism includes local churches and community
groups, such as the Lions and Kiwanis.
One has only to read about the nineteenth century robber barons or the living conditions of the meat packing plant workers in Upton Sinclair’s “The Jungle” to understand the many positive contributions of unionization and collective bargaining for the American worker. It seems that Big Business rarely establishes wages, benefits, and working conditions in the interest of its workers. But, business seems much more interested in the bottom line, the percentage of profit, and its stockholders.
The only voices advocating abolishing unions are
capitalists. Often they disdain the worker as
lazy. Some suggest that workers start their own businesses if they want to
bring home more income. And we are
supposed to emulate these people?
I find it even more disturbing that republican led state
governments, such as Wisconsin, are also attacking public service employees
unions. Their employees are the ones that make state offices and agencies run.
Isn’t this policy short-sighted at the least?
Working class Americans and those from the lower middle
class comprise 60-65% of society. Their household income is $75,000 or less.
However, they are the largest segment of society. Look at the Dennis (2002) and
Thompson & Hickey (2005) models in the Wikipedia article "American Middle Class".
When the US was a manufacturing economy these workers
were invaluable to Big Business. Now, it’s this group that suffers the largest
number of job cuts and has the hardest time finding new positions with roughly
the same wage and benefits packages.
Because working class and lower middle income comprise
over 60% of the economy, because their wages are not rising at the level of inflation,
and because proposed tax plans don’t favor them, they feel particularly
squeezed.
Both state and federal governments need to provide relief for working class and lower middle income families and not place the burden of subsidizing government programs on their
backs.
Labels:
2016,
candidate,
center,
centrist,
collective bargaining,
election,
Labor,
lower middle income,
policies,
political center,
political positions,
politics,
positions,
Pro-labor,
values,
working class
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)